Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp.

 

Email Deemed Insufficient Notification of Mandatory Arbitration for Employee Disputes with the Firm

321 F.Supp.2d 142 (Mass. 2004)

The plaintiff brought an action against his former employer alleging he was wrongfully terminated due to his medical condition. The employer had the case removed to federal court, and motioned the court to stay all federal court proceedings and compel arbitration pursuant to the defendant’s Dispute Resolution Policy (DRP). The case turned on the issue of whether the defendant’s email to its employees was sufficient notice that the employee would be giving up his right to use the federal judicial forum. The defendant offered an email tracking-log that showed that the plaintiff had opened the email in question. The defendant offered this as evidence that the plaintiff had notice of the DRP. The plaintiff however, said that he had not read the email, and was not aware of the DRP.

The court examined the email and noted that the DRP was vaguely outlined in the bottom paragraph, and that to get more specific information on the DRP, an employee would have had to click on the two links at the bottom of the message. The court noted that the defendant did nothing to verify that its employees had read, or understood the email. The court suggested that the defendant could have made its employees verify that they had read and understood the email with a signature in the form of an electronic reply or an actual written signature. The court also said that the defendant could have had mandatory meetings with a sign in sheet where the DRP would be explained. Based on this, the court ruled that the plaintiff did not have knowledge of the DRP, and therefore, the defendant could not deprive him of his right to a federal judicial forum.

 

Tags:

    Related Posts

  • Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ,  includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
  • Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season!  Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut.  Alas, we came in third.  Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks.  Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
  • QDiscovery Forensics Team Develops Award Winning App! - QDiscovery is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award.  Presented at Relativity Fest, the award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software.   Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable.  Relativity users can now produce and review mobile device data[...Read More]
  • Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise.  As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
  • QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s  Top 20 Providers of Legal Services.  The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace.  Read the whole article here.  Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]
Comments are closed.