Super Film of Am., Inc. v. UCB Films, Inc.


Party Cannot Shift Electronic Discovery Obligations Unless an Undue Burden Exists

219 F.R.D. 649 (D. Kan. 2004)

In an action for breach of contract, the defendant filed a motion to compel the plaintiff to produce electronic versions of documents including e-mails, databases, and spreadsheets. In its response to the motion to compel, the plaintiff stated that it attempted to provide electronic copies of the documents requested within its “knowledge or expertise”. The plaintiff argued that it did not have the expertise to recover any further electronic documents and the court’s order requiring such production would be unduly burdensome. As an alternative to a court order compelling production, the plaintiff proposed to make its computers available to the defendant’s technicians to inspect and make copies of any responsive electronic files or documents.

The court found that the plaintiff’s conclusory contention that it did not have the expertise to retrieve such electronic data to be inadequate. The court stated that it “cannot relieve a party of its discovery obligations based simply on that party’s unsupported assertion that such obligations are unduly burdensome. The party opposing electronic discovery on the grounds of undue burden must provide sufficient detail and explanation about the nature of the burden in terms of time, money and procedure which would be required to produce the requested documents.”

Furthermore, the court agreed with the defendant that allowing the plaintiff to satisfy its electronic discovery obligations by simply turning over its two computers to the defendant for inspection would unfairly shift the burden and expense of discovery. As such, the court ordered the plaintiff to produce the electronic documents within 30 days.


Tags: , ,

    Related Posts

  • Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ,  includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
  • Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season!  Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut.  Alas, we came in third.  Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks.  Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
  • QDiscovery QMobile App Wins Innovation Award - QDiscovery’s QMobile is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award.  Presented at Relativity Fest, the Innovation Award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software.   Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable.  Relativity users can now produce and review mobile[...Read More]
  • Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise.  As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
  • QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s  Top 20 Providers of Legal Services.  The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace.  Read the whole article here.  Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]
Comments are closed.