ADHI Parasakthi v. Township of W. Pikeland


Plaintiff Ordered to Allow Forensic Investigation of its Computers

2009 WL 1047894 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

On an appeal from a town Zoning Board, the district court ordered the plaintiff to allow the defendant’s computer expert to inspect its computers for responsive emails not produced in the first round of discovery.

The plaintiff sought a variance from the defendant’s zoning regulations in order to build a religious temple on a parcel of land within the township of West Pikeland. During discovery, the defendant made several interrogatories and document requests that it felt the plaintiff insufficiently answered. After the court ordered the plaintiff’s compliance with the discovery requests, the plaintiff produced 2600 pages of responsive documents. This production, however, contained only three emails.

Believing there must be more emails related to the planned development, the defendant again sought a court order to enforce the document requests. The plaintiff argued that, if any additional responsive emails had existed, they had since been deleted in the ordinary course of business and could not be produced. The defendant responded that mere deletion does not mean the emails were lost forever. Some emails, it said, could be recovered by a forensic collection.

Agreeing with the defendant, the court ordered the plaintiff to allow the defendant’s computer expert to forensically examine its computer systems for any responsive documents. The court reasoned that the plaintiff had not argued the emails never existed and that the defendant was entitled to fully discover any relevant information that may still exist on the computers.


Tags: , , , ,

    Related Posts

  • Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ,  includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
  • Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season!  Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut.  Alas, we came in third.  Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks.  Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
  • QDiscovery QMobile App Wins Innovation Award - QDiscovery’s QMobile is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award.  Presented at Relativity Fest, the Innovation Award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software.   Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable.  Relativity users can now produce and review mobile[...Read More]
  • Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise.  As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
  • QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s  Top 20 Providers of Legal Services.  The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace.  Read the whole article here.  Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]
Comments are closed.