Krumwiede v. Brighton Associates


United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Case No. 05 C 3003: CHARLES A. KRUMWEIDE, an individual v. BRIGHTON ASSOCIATES, LLC, and ISMAEL C. REYES, an individual.

Digest of May 8, 2006 Public Record Delivered by Judge J. Ashman

What began as an employee’s claims for breach of an Employment Agreement and backpay resulted in a counterclaim alleging tortuous interference, breach of non-compete and confidentiality duties, and violation of the Illinois Trade Secrets Act. Brighton Associates claimed that Charles Krumwiede went to work for a competitor and misappropriated a business opportunity with a potential client, and consequently sought to recover the laptop computer that Krumwiede used when he worked for Brighton in order to determine whether Brighton’s data was improperly used. Krumwiede refused to produce the laptop despite Brighton’s preservation letter demanding that Krumwiede immediately cease using the laptop and that any changes to the contents of the laptop would be regarded as deliberate spoliation of evidence.

After a motion to compel was filed by Brighton’s counsel, Greenberg Traurig, the Court ordered that a neutral third party computer forensics firm, Forensicon, Inc., be allowed to inspect the computer. Forensicon created a forensic copy of the hard drive, and issued a report identifying numerous instances of files accessed and deleted, and connection of external devices which suggested transfer of files to other computers. Forensicon also found instances of defragmentation, and further tracked activity of ZIP files with suspicious filenames which were deleted and overwritten. Krumwiede attempted to suggest that Brighton’s counsel compromised the neutrality of Forensicon by coaching Forensicon’s employees and meddling in the creation of Forensicon’s expert report. The Court held that neither counsel’s contact nor prior dealings with Forensicon compromised the neutrality of the investigation and report, as evidenced by the consistency of the initial and final versions of the expert reports.


The Court also held that Krumwiede’s actions amounted to willful and bad-faith spoliation of evidence and warranted a default judgment in favor of Brighton Associates. In deciding between default and lesser sanctions, the Court considered prejudice to Brighton, prejudice to the judicial system, deterrence and punishment. Krumwiede’s conduct showed blatant contempt for the Court and a fundamental disregard for the judicial process which could only be adequately sanctioned with a default judgment. In addition, Brighton was entitled to an award of costs and fees relating to its Motion for Sanctions, including fees paid to Brighton’s attorneys and Forensicon.


Tags: , , , , ,

    Related Posts

  • Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ,  includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
  • Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season!  Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut.  Alas, we came in third.  Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks.  Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
  • QDiscovery QMobile App Wins Innovation Award - QDiscovery’s QMobile is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award.  Presented at Relativity Fest, the Innovation Award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software.   Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable.  Relativity users can now produce and review mobile[...Read More]
  • Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise.  As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
  • QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s  Top 20 Providers of Legal Services.  The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace.  Read the whole article here.  Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]
Comments are closed.