People v. Dominguez


Court Does Not Distinguish Between Computer Files Found on Inactive or Active Memory

2004 WL 1068809 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)

In a criminal case, the defendant appealed his conviction involving the possession of child pornography. Among the defendant’s arguments was the contention that the evidence supporting his conviction was insufficient because it was discovered on the inactive memory of his computer and was only retrieved by the use of special programs that the defendant did not possess.

The court found the fact that the files were on the inactive memory of the computer to be of no consequence. During trial, the jury was instructed that there are two types of possession: actual, the person has possession of an object if he knowingly exercised direct physical control over that object, or constructive, a person has possession if he knowingly exercised control over an object or has the right to control that object.

The court reasoned that the evidence found on the inactive memory was “the result of searches conducted by appellant that resulted in child pornography being intentionally and knowingly downloaded to the active memory of his computer.” As a result, the court held that the defendant “was in actual possession of those images at the time they first appeared on his machine.” Consequently, the court found the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction on the child pornography related charges.



    Related Posts

  • Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ,  includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
  • Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season!  Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut.  Alas, we came in third.  Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks.  Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
  • QDiscovery QMobile App Wins Innovation Award - QDiscovery’s QMobile is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award.  Presented at Relativity Fest, the Innovation Award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software.   Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable.  Relativity users can now produce and review mobile[...Read More]
  • Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise.  As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
  • QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s  Top 20 Providers of Legal Services.  The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace.  Read the whole article here.  Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]
Comments are closed.