University Sports Publications Co. v. Playmakers Media Co.

 

Defendant’s Bad Faith Spoliation Leads to Adverse Inference Instruction

2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70361 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2010)

On a claim for unauthorized access of a computer system under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Southern District of New York issued an adverse inference instruction due to the defendant’s bad faith spoliation of evidence.

Plaintiff University Sports Publications (USP) filed suit against several of its former employees, who had quit in order to join the co-defendant Playmakers Media Company. USP alleged that one of its former employees, Shane Pitta, had obtained unauthorized access of its customer and sales database, which was password protected and maintained by the offsite, third-party vendor, Databasaurus. Forensic analysis showed that Pitta had obtained an exact copy of a spreadsheet from the database.

Grubb subsequently contacted the American Board of Orthodontics, which had issued him the laptop, and informed the Board of his concern that confidential patient information had been accessed. Approximately one month later, a lawyer for ABO informed Grubb that he should stop using the laptop so that any digital evidence concerning the incident would not be lost. When Grubb discussed the matter with an ABO computer specialist, however, he was told that any data concerning the incident was likely lost due to his consistent use of the laptop in the interim month.

At issue in the case was the method by which Pitta obtained the database information. If Pitta had accessed the database sometime after his departure from USP, his copying of the file would constitute an unauthorized access supporting the claim under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). If, however, Pitta had received the spreadsheet from an employee at Databasaurus, he would not have committed an unauthorized access and could not be liable under the CFAA.

No direct evidence supported a conclusion on this dispositive issue. USP had requested that Playmakers produce the laptop Pitta used during his time at Playmakers, believing that an examination would provide evidence of Pitta’s unauthorized access. Forensic analysis of the laptop Playmakers provided during discovery, however, showed that Pitta had not used that laptop. The relevant laptop remained missing.

On defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the court examined whether the evidence could support USP’s claim under the CFAA. By itself, the fact that Pitta had obtained a direct copy of the spreadsheet could not provide enough evidence to show his unauthorized access of USP’s database. Pitta’s intentional bad faith spoliation of the laptop evidence, however, justified an adverse inference that the laptop had contained evidence supporting the claim. The jury could reasonably infer that Pitta had destroyed the laptop because it would provide evidence of his unauthorized access.

Because the adverse inference provided support for the CFAA claim, the court denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

 

Tags: ,

    Related Posts

  • Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ,  includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
  • Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season!  Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut.  Alas, we came in third.  Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks.  Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
  • QDiscovery QMobile App Wins Innovation Award - QDiscovery’s QMobile is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award.  Presented at Relativity Fest, the Innovation Award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software.   Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable.  Relativity users can now produce and review mobile[...Read More]
  • Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise.  As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
  • QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s  Top 20 Providers of Legal Services.  The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace.  Read the whole article here.  Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]
Comments are closed.