Party’s Inconsistent Testimony Justifies Delayed Disclosure Of Computer Forensic Expert
2004 WL 1093385 (N.D. Ill. 2004)
In a case involving an alleged breach of a restrictive covenant, the defendant moved to strike the testimony of a computer expert who recovered deleted documents from the defendant’s computer. The defendant argued that allowing the expert’s testimony would be unfairly prejudicial because the plaintiff failed to disclose the computer expert by the required discovery deadline. The plaintiff asserted the delay was justified as it was a result of the defendant’s own deposition testimony.
During a deposition, the defendant stated that an email exchange regarding documents at issue took place on outside email accounts (Yahoo and AOL), thus making a search of his computer unnecessary. However, in a subsequent affidavit, the defendant acknowledged creating a document that theoretically could exist on his computer, and not just on his outside email accounts.
The court found the inconsistent testimonies of the defendant was a sufficient excuse for the delay. In doing so, the court stated that if the defendant “wanting to avoid ‘unfair surprise’ concerning his legal strategy, perhaps he should have followed the spirit of the discovery rules and informed [defendant] that [plaintiff’s] computer might contain relevant documents.” Consequently, the defendant’s motion was denied and the computer expert’s testimony along with the recovered documents was admissible.
- Staff Recognized for Departing Employee Investigations - The first issue of Corporate Counsel Business Journal, CCBJ, includes an interview with our Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv Schiff, and Solutions Architect, Curtis Collette, on the evolution of departing employee investigations. Departing Employee: When Do Investigations Become Necessary? appeared in the print publication, online edition, and on CCBJ’s In-House Tech website. For Increasing Numbers of Employers, Departing Employee Investigations[...Read More]
- Chicago Office Food Drive – The Results Are In - QDiscovery’s Chicago Office collected nearly 1,000 containers of food for the local food bank this Holiday Season! Our office competed with sister offices in Indiana and Connecticut. Alas, we came in third. Our sister offices each collected nearly 2,000 containers for their local food banks. Relatively new to the company-wide food drive, the Forensics Division[...Read More]
- QDiscovery QMobile App Wins Innovation Award - QDiscovery’s QMobile is winner of a 2017 Relativity Innovation Award. Presented at Relativity Fest, the Innovation Award celebrates organizations that create apps or integrations that extend the functionality of Relativity’s eDiscovery software. Our development team created an application that makes the analysis of mobile collections much more manageable. Relativity users can now produce and review mobile[...Read More]
- Moving and Changing - Acquired by Connecticut-based QDiscovery in 2016, Forensicon’s capabilities multiplied overnight, both in forensics brain power and eDiscovery expertise. As part of a leading provider of end to end litigation support, moving to larger offices that are more central to the Chicago legal community was inevitable.
- QDiscovery Named One of the Top 20 Providers of Legal Services! - Leading industry publication, CIO Magazine, has named Forensicon’s parent company, QDiscovery, to it’s Top 20 Providers of Legal Services. The annual listing includes 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing legal solutions and impacting the marketplace. Read the whole article here. Featured in the publication alongside QDiscovery President, Dave Barrett, is Director of Digital Forensics, Yaniv[...Read More]